Submitting Goal 2019: 60 Batches!
There’s a widely known challenge among writers to try to push for 100 rejections a year. Now, while no one *actually* likes rejections, what is true is that the more work you send out and the more often you submit, the more you increase your chances of having your work accepted. After all, it’s usually a numbers game anyway. Also, if you’re actually trying for 100 rejections, then each time you get one, it feels like an accomplishment rather than yet another micro-failure.
If you’re interested in learning more about the 100 Rejection Challenge, click here for an article about it in LitHub.
I applaud the 100 Rejection Challenge, and in January, I decided I wanted to try it. My submission game has steadily dwindled over the years, marred by PhD work and deadlines as well as just feeling completely let down by loads and loads of rejections. If you count rejections based on each submission batch being one (rather than each poem counting as one), then I only submitted 13 times total in all of 2018. I was bummed when I realized this.
So, I want to try to up my numbers. For one, I have some really good work I’ve been sitting on for months. Second, you miss out on 100% of what you don’t try, right? Only thing is — 100 rejections a year will stress me out way more than it would help, especially if you count each batch rather than each poem. So, I’m going to work my way up by shooting for 60 submissions this year, rather than 100 rejections. It’s a similar concept. The important thing for me is to submit more, and I don’t feel like I need to count rejections as much as I need to know that rejections will be a huge part of it and accepting that that’s very much okay. Furthermore, I’m breaking it up into five batches per month. This way, I’m not overburdened, and I can stagger submissions so as to not have too many out during each cycle (I don’t feel like writing to 30 journals to withdraw when a lucky orphan-poem finds a new home, if I can help it). Also, I’m going to blog about my process each month so as to hopefully hold myself (publicly) accountable.
Good luck to all writers sending your hard-work out into the publishing ethers. It’s cold out there in the void.
I know I’ve made the right choice when 4/5 January submissions were technically sent off in February. To be fair though, I only decided to start this challenge on January 24. One of the elements of publishing that takes the longest is to figure out what journals/magazines are publishing what you’re writing/who will be into your work. Since so much of my manuscript is based in Louisiana, I’m looking for Louisiana-based journals in addition to journals who will be interested in my aesthetic.
For January, I submitted to…
- Gulf Coast (online)
- New Orleans Review (online)
- New Delta Review
- Ninth Letter
(January Submissions finished February 5th).
The day after I finished my January submissions, I pushed myself to go ahead and finish February submissions, as well. It was NOT easy. I got really outdone really fast, and as I’m trying to finish up a manuscript, it felt like I was taking important time away from editing and writing. However, I knew it was important because February and March are about to get really busy for me, and now February is done. I likely won’t submit in March until the end of the month because of both other commitments and to give time for what I’ve submitted in January/February to cycle through. Side note: I spilled coffee all over my bed yesterday after I finished posting my update. Submitting is a messy business.
For February, I submitted to…
(February Submissions finished February 6th).